Abstract
In multimedia databases it is usual to map objects into feature vectors in high dimensional spaces. In order to speed query processing, access structures, or indices, are required. Classical spatial access structures such as the R*-tree are bound to fail when the space dimensional is not low. Fortunately, several access structures for high dimensional spaces, e.g., the SS-tree, SR-tree and M-tree have been proposed. However, each of those structures have been benchmarked in a rather ad-hoc manner. The paper benchmarks and compares all the above structures using a real dataset of 40000 high dimensional objects. All structures have been implemented on top of the GiST infrastructure to minimize the risk of implementation bias. Even though no structure can be claimed to be the undisputed winner, we have found that the SR-tree presents the best overall results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.