Abstract

In the NIST additive manufacturing benchmark (AM-Bench) experiments, melt pool geometry, cooling rates, surface topography, and dendritic microstructure in laser melted Inconel 625 were used to challenge and validate computational models of the melting and solidification process. To this end, three thermal models incorporating different physics are compared with the experimental data. It is identified that the heat convection enhanced by the thermocapillary flow inside the melt pool and heat loss caused by vaporization play pivotal roles to guarantee the accuracy of the predictions, and thus should be considered in the thermal model. Neglecting fluid flow and vaporization leads to nearly 100% difference in cooling rate during solidification, and 20% difference in cooling rate after solidification from the results. With the most accurate thermal model, surface topographies of the melt tracks are predicted and quantitatively analyzed. Using the Kurz-Fisher model, the primary dendrite arm spacing is predicted based on the thermal gradient and solidification rate predictions, while elemental segregation is predicted using the Scheil-Gulliver model and a non-equilibrium solidification model. Additionally, it is shown that increasing scan speed inhibits elemental microsegregation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.