Abstract

Genetic damage is a key event in tumorigenesis, and chemically induced genotoxic effects are a human health concern. Although genetic toxicity data have historically been interpreted using a qualitative screen-and-bin approach, there is increasing interest in quantitative analysis of genetic toxicity dose–response data. We demonstrate an emerging use of the benchmark dose (BMD)-approach for empirically ranking cross-tissue sensitivity. Using a model environmental carcinogen, we quantitatively examined responses for four genetic damage endpoints over an extended dose range, and conducted cross-tissue sensitivity rankings using BMD100 values and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs). MutaMouse specimens were orally exposed to 11 doses of benzo[a]pyrene. DNA adduct frequency and lacZ mutant frequency (MF) were measured in up to 8 tissues, and Pig-a MF and micronuclei (MN) were assessed in immature (RETs) and mature red blood cells (RBCs). The cross-tissue BMD pattern for lacZ MF is similar to that observed for DNA adducts, and is consistent with an oral route-of-exposure and differences in tissue-specific metabolism and proliferation. The lacZ MF BMDs were significantly correlated with the tissue-matched adduct BMDs, demonstrating a consistent adduct conversion rate across tissues. The BMD CIs, for both the Pig-a and the MN endpoints, overlapped for RETs and RBCs, suggesting comparable utility of both cell populations for protracted exposures. Examination of endpoint-specific response maxima illustrates the difficulty of comparing BMD values for a fixed benchmark response across endpoints. Overall, the BMD-approach permitted robust comparisons of responses across tissues/endpoints, which is valuable to our mechanistic understanding of how benzo[a]pyrene induces genetic damage.

Highlights

  • Genetic damage is recognized as an enabler of cancer, and exposure to genotoxic substances is an important human health issue (Hanahan and Weinberg 2011)

  • With respect to DNA damage, we were able to detect a significant increase in DNA adducts at 0.20 mg BaP/kg body weight (BW)/day, the lowest oral dose used to date to investigate the in vivo genotoxicity of BaP

  • By ranking benchmark dose (BMD) confidence intervals (CIs) across tissues for a given endpoint, we observed that sensitivity varied significantly across tissues in regards to induced lacZ mutant frequency (MF), and the differences were more pronounced in comparison with the DNA adduct endpoint

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genetic damage is recognized as an enabler of cancer, and exposure to genotoxic substances is an important human health issue (Hanahan and Weinberg 2011). The pervasive nature of environmental genotoxicants, the recognition in the 1970s and early 1980s that humans are invariably exposed to environmental mutagens, and the established empirical and mechanistic links between genetic damage and carcinogenesis, initiated formal chemical screening programs in Canada, the United States, Japan, and Western Europe (MacGregor et al 2015a). Chemical screening for genetic toxicity is motivated by recognition that cancer is not the only consequence of somatic mutations. Recent research has demonstrated links between in utero (geno)toxicant exposures and neurodegenerative diseases (Modgil et al 2014), reproductive defects (Fowler et al 2008; Mocarelli et al 2011), child development (Perera et al 2015) and somatic mosaicism (Erickson 2010; Meier et al 2016)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call