Ben’s body reads the Guardian

Abstract

Abstract We can say Ben is reading, but not Ben’s body is reading. The relational account says that this is because our bodies are objects that do not read. On the false-implication account, by contrast, to say Ben’s body is reading is to say that Ben is reading, while implying, falsely, that reading is some sort of brute-physical property. Besides being metaphysically neutral, this sort of view explains far better why we cannot say such things as Ben’s mind is six feet tall. But neither account explains why we cannot say Ben’s body is six feet tall. The article argues that a variant of the false-implication account can solve this puzzle.