Abstract

This paper will give an insight into the theological war discourse of the 20 th century. Focusing especially on the time after the Second World War, Karl Hormann!s scientific discourse (1915–2004) will be the pivotal element of this article. One of his main research areas was the bellum-iustum doctrine, which he restricted in a way that questioned the legitimacy of war, even though he also argued strictly against an imperative war ban. Hormann!s writings show a dichotomy, which in a certain way reflects a paradigmatic dilemma of his time. On the one hand, it demonstrates adherence to the traditional doctrines of just war and the right to defense. On the other hand, attempts of a new peace ethics become visible. Hormann!s teachings were marked by the obligation to defend justice and, at the same time, by a desire for peace.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call