Abstract

Simple SummaryFur farming has become increasingly controversial in the western world. Fur-farmed species such as mink contracting and transmitting COVID-19 have put a further spotlight on the industry. The United Kingdom (UK) and other nations have banned fur farming due to welfare concerns. Despite this, due to European Union (EU) membership, the UK has continued to import and sell fur from two million animals each year. The UK left the EU in 2020 and the British government is now considering a ban on the import and sale of fur. This paper reviews public polls on British attitudes to the fur industry conducted between 1997 and 2021. The polls reveal consistently high majority opposition to the fur industry. The paper then reports the results of a new questionnaire to explore in further depth the views of UK residents on the fur industry and attitudes to a ban. A large majority (86%) believed fur-farmed animals do not experience a good life. A similar majority (83%) believed it was unacceptable for the UK government to ban fur farming and continue to import and sell fur from producers overseas. Over three quarters (78%) supported a legal ban on the import and sale of fur in the UK.Around 100 million animals are killed annually for the global fur trade, with 85% reared on fur farms and 15% trapped in the wild. Fur farming is banned across the United Kingdom (UK) under the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Act 2000 in England and Wales and parallel legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Despite the farming bans, the import and sale of fur products to the UK have continued, largely due to European Union (EU) membership. The UK left the EU in 2020 and the British government is exploring a potential ban on the import and sale of fur post-Brexit. This paper reviews public surveys on attitudes to fur farming in the UK from 1997 to 2021. It then reports the results of an online questionnaire to investigate in greater depth the beliefs of UK residents (n = 326) about the welfare of animals used in fur production, knowledge of the legal context of the fur trade and attitudes toward a ban on the import and sale of fur in the UK. A large majority (86%) of respondents believed that fur-farmed animals do not experience a good life. Over four-fifths (83%) disagreed that it is morally acceptable for the UK government to ban fur farming and yet continue to import and sell fur from producers overseas, with over three-quarters (78%) supporting a legal ban on the import and sale of fur in the UK.

Highlights

  • COVID-19 has caused devastating impacts on public health and human society since cases of a new virus were first identified in China in 2020 [1]

  • The questionnaire consisted of three sections: section 1 collected demographic data, section 2 was concerned with beliefs about the welfare of animals killed for their fur and section 3 was about attitudes toward fur and the import and sale of fur in the United Kingdom (UK)

  • Three-quarters (75.2%) of respondents do not believe that welfare standards on fur farms are well-regulated, with only 6.2% believing they are well-regulated and 18.6% remaining neutral

Read more

Summary

Introduction

COVID-19 has caused devastating impacts on public health and human society since cases of a new virus were first identified in China in 2020 [1]. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is believed to have originated in bats and transmitted to humans through an intermediary species in a wet market in Wuhan, China [2]. COVID-19 is, a zoonotic disease, meaning it can be transmitted from vertebrate animals to 4.0/). Mustelids, including mink (Neovison vison), are susceptible to SARsCoV-2 [3]. Since 2020, there have been outbreaks on 400 mink farms in Europe and America. Raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) are susceptible to coronaviruses

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call