Abstract
In a large online experiment, we study how investors assess the relationship between their portfolio and the stock market. Participants either select a portfolio of stocks or are randomly assigned a portfolio from a U.S. stock market index. They state their portfolio return expectations conditional on different market outcomes, allowing us to calculate implied beliefs about portfolio beta. We find a general underestimation of beta, which is particularly strong for downside beta. This asymmetric assessment of dependence is amplified for participants who select a portfolio themselves instead of receiving a randomly assigned portfolio. They believe their portfolio goes up with the market but does not come down with it. Our findings reveal yet unknown patterns in beliefs about systematic risk, which shed light on the source of investor overconfidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
