Abstract
We investigated the relationship between men's degree of belief in token resistance to sexual advances—that women say no when they mean yes—and the perception that date rape has occurred. We hypothesized that men who more strongly adhere to this belief would be less likely to perceive that a rape had occurred when a woman was forced to engage in coitus and she had only verbally resisted the advances of the male (compared to physically resisting), whereas men who do not hold this belief would perceive rape to have occurred when either verbal or physical resistance was offered. Undergraduate men (N = 332) completed scales measuring several predispositional constructs, read a scenario involving a date rape, and answered questions concerning the scenario. Those with a stronger belief in token resistance perceived less date rape overall, and they were less sensitive to verbal refusal than those with a weaker belief. The possibility that combined verbal and physical resistance may send a mixed message to men wh...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.