Abstract

BackgroundEnvironmental justice research has shown that many communities of color and low-income persons are differentially burdened by noxious land uses including Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facilities. However, limited work has been performed to assess how these populations tend to be both overburdened and medically underserved. We explored this “double disparity” for the first time in Maryland.MethodsWe assessed spatial disparities in the distribution of TRI facilities in Maryland across varying levels of sociodemographic composition using 2010 US Census Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) data. Univariate and multivariate regression in addition to geographic information systems (GIS) were used to examine relationships between sociodemographic measures and location of TRI facilities. Buffer analysis was also used to assess spatial disparities. Four buffer categories included: 1) census tracts hosting one or more TRI facilities; 2) tracts located more than 0 and up to 0.5 km from the closest TRI facility; 3) tracts located more than 0.5 km and up to 1 km from a TRI facility; and 4) tracts located more than 1 km and up to 5 km from a TRI facility.ResultsWe found that tracts with higher proportions of non-white residents and people living in poverty were more likely to be closer to TRI facilities. A significant increase in income was observed with an increase in distance between a census tract and the closest TRI facility. In general, percent non-white was higher in HPSA tracts that host at least one TRI facility than in non-HPSA tracts that host at least one TRI facility. Additionally, percent poverty, unemployment, less than high school education, and homes built pre-1950 were higher in HPSA tracts hosting TRI facilities than in non-HPSA tracts hosting TRI facilities.ConclusionsWe found that people of color and low-income groups are differentially burdened by TRI facilities in Maryland. We also found that both low-income groups and persons without a high school education are both overburdened and medically underserved. The results of this study provide insight into how state agencies can better address the double disparity of disproportionate environmental hazards and limited access to health care resources facing vulnerable communities in Maryland.

Highlights

  • Environmental injustice is driven by privilege, power– structural and environmental racism which are embedded in our regulatory schema, zoning, planning and community development processes [1,2]

  • Since the 1987 report and the recent twenty-year anniversary report [5], researchers have shown that these disparities persist, with low-income persons and populations of color continuing to live in communities with a differential burden of locally unwanted land uses (LULUs) including toxic release inventory (TRI) facilities [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], landfills [5], incinerators [5], hazardous waste sites [5,18], sewer and water infrastructure including sewer and water treatment plants [7,8,19,20], coal-fired plants [5], industrial animal operations [21,22], and Superfund sites [23,24,25]

  • For the purpose of this analysis, we only present mapping results for % non-white and % poverty due to the fact that previous studies have shown a positive relationship between number of Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facilities and presence of non-whites and low-income persons

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental injustice is driven by privilege, power– structural and environmental racism which are embedded in our regulatory schema, zoning, planning and community development processes [1,2]. Since the 1987 report and the recent twenty-year anniversary report [5], researchers have shown that these disparities persist, with low-income persons and populations of color continuing to live in communities with a differential burden of LULUs including toxic release inventory (TRI) facilities [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], landfills [5], incinerators [5], hazardous waste sites [5,18], sewer and water infrastructure including sewer and water treatment plants [7,8,19,20], coal-fired plants [5], industrial animal operations [21,22], and Superfund sites [23,24,25] This disproportionate burden can lead to increased exposure to harmful environmental conditions and chemical, physical, and biological agents for impacted communities [1,2,26,27,28]. We explored this “double disparity” for the first time in Maryland

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call