Abstract

Recently, a revival of phenomenological approaches has been gaining ground in the literature of cognition and human understanding. Heidegger’s Being-in-the-World plays a decisive role here. Instead of viewing the mind as an independent entity separated from the “outer” world, these approaches assert an immediate understanding of a meaningful environment. Such an immediate understanding is seen in the light of embodied practices, when humans are engaged in skillful absorbed coping. An analysis of Heidegger’s concept of truth provides a more sophisticated view. Being-in-the-World does not always grant direct access to an immediate understanding of a meaningful environment. Often, other objects in the world conceal themselves from human view. In a first approach, this understanding of truth will be elaborated on the basis of an exegesis of Heidegger’s text concerning his question of truth. What this actually means for a phenomenological understanding will be explained by a closer look at two central topics in Being and Time: disturbance and anxiety. The idea is to show that Heidegger’s Being-in-the-World—properly interpreted—can offer a “third way” beyond the limits of a mindless coping and an understanding of the mind as a self-standing entity detached from other entities in the world.

Highlights

  • Hubert Dreyfus blames classical cognitive science for holding a distorted view of human understanding that he calls the “Cartesian model”

  • Dreyfus breaks with the Cartesian tradition by taking “Heidegger’s new approach” as “a phenomenology of ‘mindless’ coping skills that is the basis of all intellibility” (Dreyfus 1991: 3)

  • In contrast to the “Cartesian model” in which the natural world of objects can be opened by only an indirect cognitive process, that averted side of things is, according to Heidegger’s phenomenology, an integral part of the human experience

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hubert Dreyfus blames classical cognitive science for holding a distorted view of human understanding that he calls the “Cartesian model”. The open question is what such a concealment of things in conjunction with Heidegger’s Being-in-the-World truly means.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call