Abstract
We investigate the effect of the timing of green technology investment in a polluting duopoly facing environmental regulation. We consider a three-stage game where (i) firms sequentially choose their investment in the first stage, (ii) the regulator sets the optimal emission fee in the second stage, and (iii) the polluting good is produced in the third stage. When free-riding incentives are strong the leader enjoys a first-mover advantage, investing less in abatement than the follower, as in sequential public good games. We also show that sequential investment decisions achieve higher abatement than simultaneous decisions, and identify in which settings such a difference is the largest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
