Abstract
Scholars have highlighted the crucial role that immigration officials play as “street-level bureaucrats” in the implementation of restrictive immigration policies. This study describes the working and decision-making practices of immigration officials in return procedures in Belgium, based on observations, expert interviews, and an analysis of case law. We demonstrate that their work primarily involves desk work and writing justifications in their decisions. Their decision-making is characterized by a heavy sense of pragmatism and standardization, primarily focusing on “what holds up in administrative court.” In return procedures, Belgian immigration officials therefore experience little need for legitimation work: from their perspective, legitimation primarily entails meeting administrative burdens of proof. Our analysis indicates that this distanced administrative system disadvantages the affected migrants, especially considering that the appellate body evaluates procedural aspects of the decision-making rather than conducting in-depth case (re-)evaluations.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
