Abstract

Psychologica Belgica is the official journal of the Belgian Association for Psychological Sciences (BAPS). BAPS promotes the development of psychological sciences in Belgium, at both fundamental and applied research levels. The journal ensures rigorous peer-review to maintain research integrity.Psychological Belgica makes publications available online as soon as they are finalised. All publications are open access, making research available free of charge and without delay.The journal has a 2021 Impact Factor of 1.717 and a 5 year impact factor of 2.352.Subscribe to content alerts and other journal news here. You can also follow the journal on ResearchGate.

Highlights

  • Even though the number of organisational mergers and acquisitions has increased dramatically over the last decades, research has shown that about half of them fail to meet the initial targets (Cartwright & Cooper, 1992), and that most result in a financial failure (Devoge & Shiraki, 2000)

  • The present experiment was designed to establish the impact of merger status, in combination with the relative representation of the pre-merger ingroup, upon group members’ identification with the new merger group

  • Merger status did have a significant main effect upon post-merger identification: Participants who believed that the new merger group had a high status identified more strongly with this merger group than participants who believed that this merger group had a low status

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Even though the number of organisational mergers and acquisitions has increased dramatically over the last decades, research has shown that about half of them fail to meet the initial targets (Cartwright & Cooper, 1992), and that most result in a financial failure (Devoge & Shiraki, 2000). From a SIA-perspective, there are two motives why mergers constitute a threat for employees’ organisational identification. The first is related to the perceived status of the merger group. SIA assumes that individuals strive to belong to high status groups, i.e., groups that are positively differentiated from relevant comparison groups on relevant comparison dimensions. If this is the case, group membership would contribute to a positive social identity, and to a more positive self-concept. Smidts, Pruyn, and van Riel (2001) reported that the perceived external prestige (or status) of an organisation is positively related to employees’ organisational identification

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call