Abstract

Sensory cues exchanged during courtship are crucial for mate choice: if they show intraspecific divergence, this may cause or reinforce sexual isolation between strains, ultimately leading to speciation. There is a strong asymmetric sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster females from Zimbabwe (Z) and males from all other populations (M). While M and Z flies of both sexes show different cuticular pheromones, this variation is only partly responsible for the intraspecific isolation effect. Male acoustic signals are also partly involved in sexual isolation. We examined strain-specific courtship behaviour sequences to determine which body parts and sensory appendages may be involved in sexual isolation. Using two strains representative of the Z- and M-types, we manipulated sensory cues and the social context; we then measured the consequence of these manipulations on courtship and copulation. Our data suggest that Z females mated best with males whose sensory characteristics matched those of Z males in both quantity and quality. M females were less choosy and much less influenced by the sensory and social contexts. Differences in emission and reception of sensory signals seen between Z and M flies may lead to the concerted evolution of multiple sensory channel, thereby shaping a population-specific mate recognition system.

Highlights

  • Sensory signals exchanged between individuals of most vertebrate and invertebrate species are crucial for guiding intraspecific2018 The Authors

  • We examined strain-specific courtship behaviour sequences to determine which body parts and sensory appendages may be involved in sexual isolation

  • Differences in emission and reception of sensory signals seen between Z and M flies may lead to the concerted evolution of multiple sensory channel, thereby shaping a population-specific mate recognition system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sensory signals exchanged between individuals of most vertebrate and invertebrate species are crucial for guiding intraspecific2018 The Authors. Where the emission–reception link of a single sensory signal does initially diverge, this may be followed by the secondary changes that reinforce the incipient isolation between diverging populations or sub-species [7] This would explain why examples of speciation rarely turn out to be based on the variation of a single signal but rather depend on several signals acting in synergy (in human [8], mouse [9] and cockroach [10]). This suggests that each species possesses a specific mate recognition system (SMRS) combining different sensory modalities, each of which has a species-specific weight in the recognition/isolation process [11,12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call