Abstract

Most sensory stimuli evoke spiking responses that are distributed across neurons and are temporally structured. Whether the temporal structure of ensemble activity is modulated to facilitate different neural computations is not known. Here, we investigated this issue in the insect olfactory system. We found that an odourant can generate synchronous or asynchronous spiking activity across a neural ensemble in the antennal lobe circuit depending on its relative novelty with respect to a preceding stimulus. Regardless of variations in temporal spiking patterns, the activated combinations of neurons robustly represented stimulus identity. Consistent with this interpretation, locusts reliably recognized both solitary and sequential introductions of trained odourants in a quantitative behavioural assay. However, predictable behavioural responses across locusts were observed only to novel stimuli that evoked synchronized spiking patterns across neural ensembles. Hence, our results indicate that the combinatorial ensemble response encodes for stimulus identity, whereas the temporal structure of the ensemble response selectively emphasizes novel stimuli.

Highlights

  • Most sensory stimuli evoke spiking responses that are distributed across neurons and are temporally structured

  • Previous studies have shown that odourants activate temporally structured principal neuron responses in the antennal lobe that vary with and have the capacity to encode for stimulus identity and intensity[3,4,5]

  • We began by analysing the responses of projection neurons (PNs) in the antennal lobe to lengthy but solitary presentations of different odourants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most sensory stimuli evoke spiking responses that are distributed across neurons and are temporally structured. Previous studies have shown that odourants activate temporally structured principal neuron responses in the antennal lobe (and in the olfactory bulb) that vary with and have the capacity to encode for stimulus identity and intensity[3,4,5]. These response patterns are disrupted by hysteresis arising from stimulus dynamics[6,7] and recent history[8]. We reveal how information contained in the combinatorial and temporal features of stimulusevoked activities gets translated to behaviour

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.