Abstract
Agglomeration and urbanisation externalities accelerate the concentration of commercial activities in the urban space and the creation of business districts. As a result, besides the usual central business district (CBD), large cities also have more recent, peripheral, and specialised secondary business districts (SBDs). There is little substantial research on the formation of SBDs in rapidly globalising, semi-peripheral locations, especially in post-socialist metropolises of Central and Eastern Europe. This includes Warsaw, Poland, which is being transformed into an emerging global metropolis. The article aims to determine the differences between the CBD and the SBD in Warsaw in terms of their attractiveness to companies and employees and the spatial behaviours of employees, especially in terms of transport and shopping. The research hypotheses indicate the differences between the two districts in terms of the type of agglomeration economies, transport accessibility, and components of the competitive advantage, as well as the characteristics of companies in those districts. The data are from a survey conducted in 2017–2018 among companies and their employees in both business districts, and they are analysed using basic statistical techniques and discriminatory analysis. The results confirmed there are significant differences between the two Warsaw business areas, mainly in terms of their transport accessibility and urbanisation externalities. In terms of transport, there is a greater role for public transport and rail in the CBD and for motorway and airport proximity in the SBD. Urbanisation externalities are significantly diminished by the traffic congestion in the SBD. The study also revealed that the development of commercial areas in Warsaw—a post-socialist city with a neoliberal model of spatial planning—follows only in some aspects the spatial patterns of business areas in other Western European metropolises.
Highlights
The new development paradigm of the information econ‐ omy increases the role of information and communi‐ cation technologies (ICT), creativity, and innovation as key factors of the competitiveness of an enterprise
The t‐test showed that the attractiveness factors of the central business district (CBD) were its cen‐ tral location, greater public transport and rail accessibility, the location’s prestige, and rich culture and entertainment available
The attractiveness of CBDs was shaped by greater access to shops and restaurants, while that of secondary business districts (SBDs) was shaped by the availability of parking for clients and employees and opportunities for expansion
Summary
The new development paradigm of the information econ‐ omy increases the role of information and communi‐ cation technologies (ICT), creativity, and innovation as key factors of the competitiveness of an enterprise. Control and management functions of the global information economy are often concentrated in urban centres and metropolitan regions (Castells, 1998), where spatial structure is characterised by the deconcentra‐ tion of economic activity (Criekingen et al, 2007; Hall & Pain, 2006). Such deconcentration and decentralisa‐ tion may take the form of a chaotic sprawl (Lang, 2003) or a “concentrated dispersion” (Filion, 2000). The emergence of new types of economic areas may eventually weaken the tra‐ ditional city centre and create polycentric metropolitan structures in which traditional central business districts (CBDs) still play an important role but are accompanied by the secondary business districts (SBDs), in the form of edge cities (Garreau, 1991) or other urban or suburban structures (Bole, 2010; Hall, 1999; Ratcliffe et al, 2009)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
