Abstract
Some problems in reconciling behaviourism as pure science with clinical behaviour therapy for complex neurotic and personality disorders are examined. A major problem is the inability of scientific behaviourism to permit motivation, will and choice to be considered from an intrapsychic perspective. Cognitive behaviour therapy and its derivatives have been developed in an attempt to overcome this problem. Although such therapies have retained a paradigmatic attachment to behaviourism, they have more in common with psychodynamic psychotherapy. Conflict among contemporary behaviourists about the relevance of cognitive theory to behaviourism has obscured more fundamental issues such as the role of the patients-therapist relationship. Both classical and cognitive behaviour therapists view a direct examination of the patient-therapist relationship as therapeutically irrelevant, although there is evidence that such a viewpoint may be anti-therapeutic in some severe neurotic disorders. Behaviourists must acknowledge the central importance of examining the patient-therapist relationship in such disorders if they are to continue their successful dialectic with psychodynamic therapists.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
