Abstract
The emergence of agriculture and complex societies during the Near-Eastern Neolithic opened a new era in human evolution. Food production seriously affected the ecological environment, and societies answered this with large-scale division of labour and specialisation. In this paper we study this transition with an individual based model framework. Our model captures the connections between the appearance of agriculture, social division of labour, and behavioural diversity. Our two main settings represent different habitats: In the pre-Neolithic habitat resources fluctuate in time and there is no large-scale food storage. In the Neolithic habitat active food production results in economic surplus. We consider a sexually reproducing social group, where individuals solve different tasks for survival. We assume that the task solving effectiveness has a genetic basis, but also improves with experience and learning. Since tasks can require more or less different skills, there is a trade-off between the genetic affinities for different tasks. Individuals are born with inherited task choice strategies that they can improve by imitating more successful peers. We have shown that for the Neolithic case both phenotypic (task choice strategy) and genetic specialisation is possible, if scarcer goods are more valuable. As the number of tasks increase, specialisation evolves only in a much larger group. Although phenotypic specialisation is often present, genetic specialisation requires strong assortativity both during imitation and mate choice. Our model shows that if economic surplus becomes available, behavioural specialisation and large-scale division of labour is likely to appear.
Highlights
It is common sense that the adoption of agricultural food production and sedentary life changed human societies immensely
In this paper we describe a model that studies the connections among food production, human social division of labor, and behavioral diversity
In this paper we have studied a so-far neglected aspect of the Neolithic transition, the emergence of social division of labor
Summary
It is common sense that the adoption of agricultural food production and sedentary life changed human societies immensely. This process, called the Neolithic transition, led to larger settlements, changing morals, social stratification, and, later to urbanization and industrialization (Diamond, 1999; Boehm, 2001; Gowdy and Krall, 2013). There are societies that still did not (or did not fully) take up agriculture These societies, which fall under the Behavioral Specialization During the Neolithic categories of small-scale societies, subsistence societies, huntergatherers, etc., are fairly good models of pre-agricultural (or pre-Neolithic) human life (Boehm, 2000). In this paper we concentrate on the first transition, and probably the best documented, the Near Eastern Neolithic, hereafter the Neolithic
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.