Abstract

Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. However, studies of cognitive control have largely relied on visual tasks, even though the functional deficits in schizophrenia are more frequent and severe in the auditory domain (i.e., hallucinations). Hence, we developed an auditory analogue of a visual ignore/suppress paradigm. Healthy adults (N = 40) listened to a series of four letters (600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony) presented alternately to each ear, followed by a 3.2-s maintenance interval and a probe. Participants were directed either to selectively ignore (I) the to-be-presented letters at one ear, to suppress (S) letters already presented to one ear, or to remember (R) all presented letters. The critical cue was provided either before (I) or after (S) the encoding series, or simultaneously with the probe (R). The probes were encoding items presented to either the attended/not suppressed ear (“valid”) or the ignored/suppressed ear (“lure”), or were not presented (“control”). Replicating prior findings during visual ignore/suppress tasks, response sensitivity and latency revealed poorer performance for lure than for control trials, particularly during the suppress condition. Shorter suppress than remember latencies suggested a behavioral advantage when discarding encoded items from WM. The paradigm-related internal consistencies and 1-week test–retest reliabilities (n = 38) were good to excellent. Our findings validate these auditory WM tasks as a reliable manipulation of proactive control and set the stage for studies with schizophrenia patients who experience auditory hallucinations.

Highlights

  • Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions

  • To investigate the role of proactive control during auditory processing, which would be of particular value in studies of cognitive function in schizophrenia (e.g., Barch & Ceaser, 2012), this study introduced an auditory analogue of visual ignore/suppress WM tasks (Nee & Jonides, 2008, 2009; Smith et al, 2011)

  • The present study introduced a new auditory WM paradigm that closely emulates visual ignore/suppress WM tasks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. The ability to selectively attend to goal-relevant information is essential to a properly functioning working memory (WM) system (see, e.g., see Jonides & Nee, 2006, for a review) This skill, referred to as proactive control, allows individuals to disregard task-irrelevant information while simultaneously maintaining and updating information needed to achieve specific goals. (1) prevent (ignore) irrelevant information from entering WM or (2) retroactively suppress irrelevant information that has already entered WM (Nee & Jonides, 2008, 2009; Smith et al, 2011) These so-called ignore/suppress tasks have been successfully used with schizophrenia patients (Eich, Nee, Insel, Malapani, & Smith, 2014; Smith et al, 2011) and have been identified by the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) consortium as one of two promising WM paradigms to study interference control (goal maintenance being the other) for the development of neuroimaging biomarkers in schizophrenia (Barch, Moore, Nee, Manoach, & Luck, 2012). The ignore task taps into the ability to filter out items that are task-irrelevant, whereas the suppress task measures the ability to actively manipulate information already held within WM

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call