Abstract

To reduce biodiversity loss, human behavioral change is crucial. However, there has been a significant paucity of effective conservation behavioral interventions, which help establish evidence-based policymaking and lead to the understanding of intervention effectiveness mediators. This study focused on preventing the unintentional introduction of non-native species by examining the effectiveness of four behavioral interventions using an experiment and a questionnaire. The interventions sought to induce footwear cleaning, which reduces non-native species introduction via footwear, at a cleaning station. Responses were considerably heterogeneous across interventions—that is, nudging visitors toward the cleaning station using foot-stamps placed on the ground had the largest impact, while providing procedural knowledge also had a significant effect. Further, the impact of these two interventions differed greatly depending on the degree of individuals' knowledge and/or personalized involvement in the unintentional introduction process. To maximize the impact of and improve interventions, we suggest accounting for the personal factors of the targeted individuals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call