Abstract

We compared feeding behavior of frugivorous civets with those of other sympatric frugivores in a Bornean rainforest. For each frugivore residing in 3 different species of fig trees ( Ficus variegata , F. fistulosa , and F. benjamina ), we recorded temporal visitation patterns, visitation length, and time spent searching for fruit spanning 1,758h of observations. The civets were strict nocturnal visitors, whereas the other 5 frugivorous species were diurnal visitors. Civets visited F. variegata , F. fistulosa , and F. benjamina trees until 51, 26, and 0.3 days before the end of fruiting, respectively, whereas the other frugivores visited the trees until 84.5, 32, and 1.2 days before the end of fruiting. Civets foraged longer in the F. variegata , F. fistulosa , and F. benjamina trees at each visit (119.17, 109.37, and 97.77min, respectively) than did the other frugivores (39.88, 17.06, and 40.2min). Civet search times (62.61, 27.55, and 18.9s) were longer than those of the other frugivores (34.34, 12.46, and 9.49s), and civet search duration significantly increased over time. Our results indicate that nocturnality is the most important factor in avoiding contest competition with larger diurnal frugivores, thus enabling long visits at feeding patches although long search times decreased feeding efficiency. Long foraging visits of civets would be advantageous in fruit-deficient environments and may compensate for their morpho-physiological disadvantages for frugivory.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.