Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS The redundant bilateral visual presentation of verbal stimuli decreases asymmetry and increases the cooperation between the two hemispheres.The increased cooperation between the hemispheres is related to semantic information during lexical processing.The inter-hemispheric interaction is represented by both inhibition and cooperation.This study explores inter-hemispheric interaction (IHI) during a lexical decision task by using a behavioral approach, the bilateral presentation of stimuli within a divided visual field experiment. Previous studies have shown that compared to unilateral presentation, the bilateral redundant (BR) presentation decreases the inter-hemispheric asymmetry and facilitates the cooperation between hemispheres. However, it is still poorly understood which type of information facilitates this cooperation. In the present study, verbal stimuli were presented unilaterally (left or right visual hemi-field successively) and bilaterally (left and right visual hemi-field simultaneously). Moreover, during the bilateral presentation of stimuli, we manipulated the relationship between target and distractors in order to specify the type of information which modulates the IHI. Thus, three types of information were manipulated: perceptual, semantic, and decisional, respectively named pre-lexical, lexical and post-lexical processing. Our results revealed left hemisphere (LH) lateralization during the lexical decision task. In terms of inter-hemisphere interaction, the perceptual and decision-making information increased the inter-hemispheric asymmetry, suggesting the inhibition of one hemisphere upon the other. In contrast, semantic information decreased the inter-hemispheric asymmetry, suggesting cooperation between the hemispheres. We discussed our results according to current models of IHI and concluded that cerebral hemispheres interact and communicate according to various excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms, all which depend on specific processes and various levels of word processing.

Highlights

  • The majority of individuals show a left hemisphere (LH) predominance for language processing (Josse and Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2004)

  • Accuracy (% CR) In terms of Accuracy, the results revealed the visual hemifield’s main effects of [F1(1, 39) = 65.24; percentage of reduction of error (PRE) = 62; p < 0.05; F2(1, 63) = 32.96; PRE = 0.34; p < 0.05] with more accurate responses for right visual hemi-field (RVF)-LH (M = 71.05%, SD = 1.35%) than for left visual hemi-field (LVF)-right hemisphere (RH) (M = 61.85%, SD = 1.11%)

  • SECOND STEP ANOVA We considered the visual hemi-field of presentation (RVF-LH, LVF-RH) and the experimental condition (UVF, bilateral redundant (BR), bilateral non-redundant semantic related (BNR_SR), between NR semantic unrelated (BNR_SU), bilateral non-redundant (BNR)) as within-subject factors for word items

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The majority of individuals show a left hemisphere (LH) predominance for language processing (Josse and Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2004). A briefly presented stimulus (flashed) in one’s visual hemi-field is processed first by the opposite hemisphere (LH for the right visual hemi-field presentation; right hemisphere-RH for left visual hemi-field presentation). The logic behind this procedure is that visual verbal stimuli are processed faster and more efficiently if they are presented first to the specialized hemisphere to process language, generally the left one (Bourne, 2006). The degree of hemispheric specialization (LH > RH) varies according to the language task and the psycholinguistic features of the stimuli

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call