Abstract

Social species can depend on each other for survival, helping in rearing of young, predator defense, and foraging. Personality dynamics between individuals may influence cooperative behaviors. Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) live in social communities and cooperate with other conspecifics to achieve goals both in the wild and in human care. We investigated the role that personality plays in the willingness of dolphins to work together. We tested five bottlenose dolphin pairs at the Roatan Institute for Marine Sciences, Honduras, with an apparatus previously used to experimentally test dolphin cooperation. Personality profiles of each dolphin were created using surveys completed by the caretakers, in particular noting two different categories of interactions: dolphin to dolphin and dolphin to world. We hypothesized that dyadic success in the cooperative task would differ based on specific personality traits of individuals. We also hypothesized that the most successful dyads would show similar types of conspecific sociality and different means of interacting with objects. Although none of the dolphin pairs cooperated to open the apparatus, individual personalities were analyzed in relation to the dolphins’ individual and mutual interactions with the apparatus as well as the pairs’ social behaviors. Playfulness, curiosity, and affiliation as well as agreeableness, and extraversion were positively related to affiliation with the apparatus and each other. These findings suggest that certain aspects of personality are indicative of affiliation or interaction by an individual dolphin. These results could guide future animal research on the relationship between personality, social interactions, and problem-solving.

Highlights

  • Social species can depend on each other for survival, help in the rearing of young, predator defense, and foraging

  • The analyses showed that all three raters were reliable for nine of the ten dolphins with a W ≥ 0.80

  • We found that none of the dolphin dyads successfully cooperated to solve the task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social species can depend on each other for survival, help in the rearing of young, predator defense, and foraging. Such stable interindividual differences may affect all aspects of the community (Réale et al, 2007; Webster & Ward, 2011) These consistent differences in behavior within individuals may be considered personality types (Bergmüller & Taborsky, 2010). Personality, or stable interindividual differences that persist over time, is a topic of growing interest within the study of animal behavior, but an in-depth understanding of how personality affects individual social interactions is needed (Gosling, 2008; Webster & Ward, 2011). Much of the research exploring interactions of personalities within groups of social species examines individuals, a less commonly explored dynamic is that of personality similarities and differences within dyads (Webster & Ward, 2011). Whereas some activities require the participation of a group, others only require cooperation between two individuals including rearing of young, conflict resolution, foraging, and mate acquisition (Connor et al, 1992; Gabriel & Black, 2012; Massen & Koski, 2014; Schuett & Dall, 2009)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call