Abstract

The nature of the E–E’ bonds (E, E’ = S and Se) in glutathione disulfide (1) and derivatives 2–3, respectively, was elucidated by applying quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules (QTAIM) dual functional analysis (QTAIM-DFA), to clarify the basic contribution of E–E’ in the biological redox process, such as the glutathione peroxidase process. Five most stable conformers a–e were obtained, after applying the Monte-Carlo method then structural optimizations. In QTAIM-DFA, total electron energy densities Hb(rc) are plotted versus Hb(rc) − Vb(rc)/2 at bond critical points (BCPs), where Vb(rc) are potential energy densities at BCPs. Data from the fully optimized structures correspond to the static nature. Those containing perturbed structures around the fully optimized one in the plot represent the dynamic nature of interactions. The behavior of E–E’ was examined carefully. Whereas E–E’ in 1a–3e were all predicted to have the weak covalent nature of the shared shell interactions, two different types of S–S were detected in 1, depending on the conformational properties. Contributions from the intramolecular non-covalent interactions to stabilize the conformers were evaluated. An inverse relationship was observed between the stability of a conformer and the strength of E–E’ in the conformer, of which reason was discussed.

Highlights

  • E–E’ bonds (E, E’ = S and Se) play a crucial role in biological redox processes [1]

  • We reported the dynamic and static behavior of S–S in while it is a maximum on the interatomic surface separating the atomic basins. ρ(r) at bond critical points (BCPs) is denoted by ρb and other quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules (QTAIM) functions are denoted in a similar way

  • It is challenging to clarify the nature of the E–E’ bonds (E, E’ = S and Se) in by the corresponding bond paths (BPs), but we must be careful to use the correct terminology with glutathione disulfide and its derivatives (1–3), the structures of 1–3 are considerably more the concept

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scheme 1 summarizes a catalytic mechanism proposed for the antioxidant activity of GPx, which is a typical example of the intervention of E–E’ (E, E’ = S, Se) in biological reactions According to this mechanism, two equivalents of GSH are oxidized to the corresponding oxidized disulfide in the overall process, while the hydroperoxide is reduced to water [14,15]. Extended form in the observed structure conformers must exist in such compounds, primarily due to the intramolecular HBs. of 4 may be the result of the electrostatic repulsion of the positive charges developed on 4. It is challenging to clarify the nature of the E–E’ bonds (E, E’ = S and Se) in glutathione disulfide and its derivatives (1–3), the structures of 1–3 are considerably more complex relative to 4–6, respectively.

Structures
Methodological Details in Calculations
Results and Discussion
Structural Feature of 1a–6a and 7–9
Molecular
Factors Determining the Relative Energies of 1a–6a
Proposed
Contour plots ofof
Figure
Nature of the E–E’ Bonds in 1a–6e
Factors that Stabilize the E–E’ Bonds and the Conformers
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.