Abstract

Using a significant number of transverse hoops in the joint’s core is one recognized way for achieving the requirements of strength, stiffness, and ductility under dynamic loading in a column joint. The shear capacity of a joint is influenced by the concrete’s compressive strength, the anchoring of longitudinal beam reinforcement, the number of stirrups in the joint, and the junction’s aspect ratio. Seismic motion on the beam may produce shear capacity and bond breaking in the joint, causing the joint to fracture. Furthermore, due to inadequate joint design and details, the entire structure is jeopardized. In this study, the specimens were divided into two groups for corner and interior beam–column joints based on the joint reinforcement detailing. The controlled specimen has joint detailing as per IS 456:2000, and the strengthened specimen has additional diagonal cross bars (modified reinforcement technique) at the joints detailed as per IS 456:200. The displacement time history curve, load-displacement response curves, load-displacement hysteretic curve, and load cycle vs. shear stress were used to compare the results of the controlled and strengthened specimens. The findings show that adding diagonal cross bars (modified reinforcing techniques) to beam–column joints exposed to cyclic loads enhances their performance. The inclusion of a diagonal cross bar increased the stiffness of the joint by giving an additional mechanism for shear transfer and ductility, as well as greater strength with minimum cracks.

Highlights

  • Researchers are looking into both kinds of beam–column joints

  • The behavior of beam–column joints in reinforced concrete (RC) structures is of great importance for the seismic behavior of a whole structure

  • The behavior of beam–column joints in RC structures is of great importance for the beneficial, and new methods, techniques, and procedures can help achieve a better underseismic behavior of a whole

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The beam–column joint is the crucial zone in a reinforced concrete (RC) frame subjected to large forces during several ground shaking events, and its behavior has a significant influence on the response of the structure. Beam–column joints are the link between horizontal and vertical structural elements, and the joints are directly involved in the transfer of seismic forces [1]. The strength of the joint’s component materials is restricted, and the joint’s force-carrying capacity is restricted. Joints can be severely damaged or even destroyed during an earthquake [2,3]. The primary cause of joint failure is insufficient joint shear strength, which occurs due to insufficient and inadequate reinforcing details at the junction region [4]. Since fixing a fractured joint is challenging, the damage

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call