Abstract
This paper experimentally investigated the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of one-way basalt and glass fibre-reinforced polymers (BFRP and GFRP) reinforced concrete (RC) slabs compared with that of traditional steel RC ones. A total of nine 2000×700×100 mm RC slabs, including three BFRP RC (BRC), three GFRP RC (GRC), and three steel RC (SRC) slabs, were tested. The results indicated that the behaviour of BRC and GRC slabs was governed by the elastic characteristic of FRP bars, resulting in a more uniform curvature of the slabs. The behaviour and failure modes of BRC and GRC slabs were comparable with those of SRC slabs. The similarity and difference were characterized by the rupture of FRP bars and the yielding of steel bars. Postcrack stiffness of BRC and GRC slabs was significantly lower than that of SRC slabs and was marginally affected by the effect of cyclic loading. The ultimate loads and ultimate deflections of BRC and GRC slabs were ∼2.0 and 1.6–2.0 times those of SRC slabs, respectively. Concepts of ductility, safety factor, and warning index were introduced and quantified for FRP RC slabs. BRC and GRC slabs had a significantly higher ductility (8.5–10.4) than SRC slabs (5.1–6.2), showing a highly ductile behaviour. SRC slabs had a safety factor of 1.0–1.1, while BRC and GRC slabs had a significantly higher safety factor of 3.8, showing their lower failure probability of BRC and GRC slabs when they are designed at a similar load as SRC slabs. The warning index of SRC slabs was 14.4–30.2, and that of BRC and GRC slabs was 65.1–71.6 and 63.9–86.0, respectively. The strength, ductility, safety factor, recovery, and warning index of BRC and GRC slabs were high, confirming their advanced characteristics. Under cyclic loading, BRC and GRC slabs have significantly larger stiffness degradations (4.4 %–7.2 %/cycle) than SRC slabs (1.62 %−3.2 %/cycle). The results of theoretical analyses showed that the strengths of BRC and GRC slabs can be reasonably predicted. The outcomes indicate the high potential use of FRP reinforcement for slabs in engineering practice.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.