Abstract

AbstractThe nature of the AI‐*‐AI and AI‐*‐BI interactions in BI‐*‐AI‐*‐AI‐*‐BI of I4 σ(4c–6e) in the tellurolane system, C4H8(I)Te–I···I–I···I–Te(I)C4H8 (1), and the models is elucidated with QTAIM dual functional analysis (QTAIM‐DFA). Asterisks (*) are employed to emphasize the existence of bond critical points (BCPs) on the interactions in question. Data from the fully optimized structures correspond to the static nature. Data from the perturbed structures around the fully optimized ones with the fully optimized structures represent the dynamic nature of interactions in QTAIM‐DFA. The AI‐*‐AI and AI‐*‐BI interactions in the optimized structure of 1 (Ci)calcd are predicted to have the Cov‐w (weak covalent) nature appeared in the shared shell region and the t‐HBwc (typical hydrogen bonds with covalency) nature appeared in the regular closed shell (r‐CS) region, respectively. However, both AI‐*‐AI and AI‐*‐BI interactions in the observed structure in crystals (1 (Ci)obsd) appear in the r‐CS region. The isolated structure of only one molecule in vacuum for 1 (Ci)calcd vs that surrounded by the same molecules for 1 (Ci)obsd arises the different results. The nature of AI‐*‐AI and AI‐*‐BI in BI‐*‐AI‐*‐AI‐*‐BI of I4 σ(4c–6e) for the models is similarly analyzed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call