Abstract
�is simulated using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solution, detached-eddy simulation, and delayeddetached eddy simulation. This case features a relatively thick boundary layer with a mild trailing-edge separation. Detailed comparisons of the modeled Reynolds stresses are carried out with the available experimental data at different locations on the suction side of the airfoil and in the wake region. The impact of the delayed switching on modeled Reynolds stresses from delayed-detached-eddy simulation as compared with the original detached-eddy simulation is studied. On the suction side of the airfoil, the modeled turbulent Reynolds stresses computed through the detached-eddy simulation are generally lower than the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solutions, whereas the delayed-detached-eddy simulation gives comparable values with the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokessolutionsresults.NoneofthemgiveconsistentcomparisonwiththeexperimentalReynoldsstresses.It is observed that for the cases with the mild separation, the original detached-eddy simulation may perform better than the delayed-detached-eddy simulation, due to its relatively lower turbulent dissipation levels. The detachededdy simulation Reynolds stresses in the wakeregion show better results, in comparisonwith the experimental data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.