Abstract

Simple SummaryThe relationship between animal welfare and housing conditions is still a matter of debate. The present study aimed to evaluate animal welfare of undocked heavy pigs from the same farm, raised in buildings with different ventilation systems, i.e., mechanical and natural, throughout the fattening period (90–160 kg average weight). Ventilation efficiency was evaluated using computational fluid dynamics. Results showed that overall pigs raised in the mechanical ventilated building were in a more positive affective state. Despite that, with hot temperatures, the higher occurrence of pig soiling indicated heat stress and consequent welfare impairment. The higher frequencies of dog sitting behavior also indicated worsening of welfare conditions in the middle–late phases of fattening, likely imputable to the lack of stimuli and boredom in the pigs.The present study aimed to evaluate animal welfare of pigs from the same farm, raised with two ventilation systems. The study involved 60 pens of fattening pigs, raised in two buildings: one naturally ventilated (NV) and the other mechanically ventilated (MV). Pigs were assessed on three observation days: at 40 kg (T1), 100 kg (T2), and 160 kg (T3) of live weight. Animal-based measures were used such as qualitative behavioral analysis (QBA), behavioral measures (BMs), and lesion and health measures (LHMs). Housing conditions (HCs) measured at each observation day were the number of pigs per pen, space allowance, temperature, light, and CO2. The association study was performed using a general linear model and analysis of variance. Ventilation effect was analyzed by performing computational fluid dynamics. Results showed that overall pigs raised in the MV were in a more positive affective state. Despite that, with hot temperatures, the higher occurrence of pig soiling indicated heat stress in pigs and consequent welfare impairment. The higher frequency of pigs showing dog sitting behavior at T2 and T3 suggest welfare worsening in the last phases of fattening. The study concludes that ventilation system influences animal behavior and overall animal welfare, especially during the warmer season.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAnimal-based measures (ABMs) are considered the most reliable indicators to assess the welfare status of an animal and to identify the risk factors in the management and environmental conditions [1]

  • The main difference was obtained in the first assessment (T1), where naturally ventilated (NV) had a score of 17.8 and mechanically ventilated (MV) had a score of 51.07

  • The qualitative behavioral analysis (QBA) assessment showed that animals in the mechanically ventilated pens were in a more positive affective state, in accordance with the higher ventilation performance of the MV building, characterized by higher indoor air velocity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal-based measures (ABMs) are considered the most reliable indicators to assess the welfare status of an animal and to identify the risk factors in the management and environmental conditions [1]. They include a large variety of indicators such as behavior, clinical signs (e.g., skin lesions, pathologies), and physiological and productive parameters. The external wind influences the indoor velocity magnitude and distribution [7] In these systems, the accurate control of the indoor conditions is not always feasible, especially on warm days, when the windows and vents of the barns are fully open [8]. In both natural and mechanical ventilation systems, the ventilation efficiency can vary depending on the geometry of the piggery structure; it should be carefully evaluated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call