Abstract

AbstractFractures are discontinuities in rock that can be exploited by erosion. Fractures regulate cohesion, profoundly affecting the rate, style, and location of Earth surface processes. By modulating the spatial distribution of erodibility, fractures can focus erosion and set the shape of features from scales of fluvial bedforms to entire landscapes. Although early investigation focused on fractures as features that influence the orientation and location of landforms, recent work has started to discern the mechanisms by which fractures influence the erodibility of bedrock. As numerical modeling and field measurement techniques improve, it is rapidly becoming feasible to determine how fractures influence geomorphic processes, as opposed to when or where. However, progress is hampered by a lack of research coordination across scales and process domains. We review studies from hillslope, glacial, fluvial, and coastal domains from the scale of reaches and outcrops to entire landscapes. We then synthesize this work to highlight similarities across domains and scales and suggest knowledge gaps, opportunities, and methodological challenges that need to be solved. By integrating knowledge across domains and scales, we present a more holistic conceptualization of fracture influences on geomorphic processes. This conceptualization enables a more unified framework for future investigation into fracture influences on Earth surface dynamics. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Highlights

  • Earth’s surface can be characterized on a broad scale by discontinuities, or fractures, which separate otherwise continuous Earth materials

  • In the realm of processes that are viewed as being directly impacted by fractures, this effort has led to important conceptualizations and models of processes such as fluvial plucking (Chatanantavet and Parker, 2009; Lamb et al, 2015), glacial quarrying (Hallet, 1996), coastal erosion (Naylor and Stephenson, 2010), and hillslope stability (Clarke and Burbank, 2010; Loye et al, 2012)

  • Orientation, and anisotropy at the hillslope and valley scale set the maximum size of sediment delivered downslope to rivers and glaciers (Sklar et al, 2017). This sediment acts as tools and cover in fluvial erosion (Sklar and Dietrich, 2004), but a strong link between fracture spacing and the eventual size of sediment delivered to rivers has yet to be determined, mainly due to the myriad of breakdown processes that occur between the production of sediment from bedrock and its eventual transport to the channel

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earth’s surface can be characterized on a broad scale by discontinuities, or fractures, which separate otherwise continuous Earth materials. In the realm of processes that are viewed as being directly impacted by fractures, this effort has led to important conceptualizations and models of processes such as fluvial plucking (Chatanantavet and Parker, 2009; Lamb et al., 2015), glacial quarrying (Hallet, 1996), coastal erosion (Naylor and Stephenson, 2010), and hillslope stability (Clarke and Burbank, 2010; Loye et al, 2012). In these domains, progress has been made to the point of being able to rudimentarily model fractures acting as controls on the rate, style, and spatial occurrence of geomorphic processes.

Definition of Scope
Review of the Influence of Fractures on Geomorphic Processes and Forms
Relationships Between Fracture Geometry and the Style and Rate of Erosion
Landscape Scale Fracture Influences on Erosion Rate and Style
Fracture Geometry Controls on Fluvial Erosion Rate and Style
Determining Thresholds for Erosion Process Dominance in Bedrock Rivers
Fracture Controls on the Morphology of Hillslopes and Valleys
Fracture Controls on the Reach Scale Morphology of Rivers
Feedbacks Between Erosion and Fracture Propagation
Fracture Propagation Feedbacks at the Landscape and Valley Scales
Fracture Propagation Feedbacks at the Reach and Outcrop Scales
Process Dominance in Eroding Bedrock
Understanding Fracture Geometry Influences on Erosion Rates
Understanding Feedbacks on Fracture Propagation
Prominent Methodological Challenges
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.