Abstract

What happened in the past is often the result of human behaviour (individual or collective) that was guided by certain ideas, beliefs and intentions, and influenced by the historical context in which it happened. It can be argued that understanding past behaviour is essential for historical understanding, and therefore students' ideas about making sense of people in the past are important for history education. This article reports on aspects of a broader qualitative study of students' and teachers' ideas of historical empathy. More specifically, the study explores participants' reasoning in terms of the ideas they use to explain the behaviour of groups of people in the past and the present. The sample was drawn from two urban primary schools in Nicosia, Cyprus; 68 students, aged between 8 and 12, and five history teachers in the sample classes participated in it. Pen-and-paper tasks, semi-structured interviews and classroom observations were used as data generation instruments. This article focuses on some of the findings of the analysis of students' responses to pen-and-paper tasks, which asked them to explain religious practices for the treatment of diseases used by two different groups in the past. These findings suggest the existence of ideas of historical empathy identified by previous studies. In this sense, they contribute to the existing evidence of the presence of these ideas in a variety of educational and cultural contexts.

Highlights

  • What happened in the past is often the result of human behaviour that was guided by certain ideas, beliefs and intentions, and influenced by the historical context in which it happened

  • Talking about the beginnings of the Schools Council History Project, which transformed history education in England from the early 1970s by teaching the subject as a discipline requiring historical thinking and the use of sources, David Sylvester, the originator and first director of the project, referred to historical empathy as ‘a word I brought into history teaching which caused me a lot of trouble, but

  • Much of the controversy surrounding historical empathy is due to a lack of consensus about the meaning of the term, which in turn leads to different ideas and even confusion about what empathizing, or having empathy, with people in the

Read more

Summary

Introduction

What happened in the past is often the result of human behaviour (individual or collective) that was guided by certain ideas, beliefs and intentions, and influenced by the historical context in which it happened. It should be pointed out that today there is a consensus about some of the key aspects of what understanding people in the past entails, such as the importance of knowledge about people’s ideas, beliefs and historical context, authors in the field of history education have not reached agreement on other aspects.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call