Abstract

Cognitive biases such as the base-rate fallacy are well known in theory, but until recently there exists only limited research how to cope with those biases in managerial decision-making. Hence, the aim of our study is to examine how management accountants should prepare information in order to reduce the phenomenon of base-rate neglect in probability judgments to guide rational managerial decision-making. To address this research question, we use an experimental design. Empirical evidence suggests that a visual-based information format, especially in comparison to a tabular representation, significantly reduces the fallacy of neglecting base-rates. In addition, we integrate user’s cognitive style and other personal characteristics as possible factors influencing the base-rate fallacy. Underlying mechanism and individual differences are discussed. Based on our findings, we offer advice to management accountants and guidance for future research directions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.