Abstract
This article aims to illustrate the principles of bearing fixing, a new computer-controlled procedure for subjective determination of astigmatism, and to compare it with conventional clinician-controlled Jackson crossed-cylinder refraction. The principles and method for bearing fixing are described. Astigmatism was measured using bearing fixing and Jackson cross-cylinder twice on 20 visually normal participants aged between 18 and 34years. After final sphere adjustment, acuity measurements were made with each refraction estimate. Bearing fixing results could be obtained for all participants. Mean bearing fixing cylinder magnitude was slightly higher than Jackson cross-cylinder measures of cylinder magnitude, by 0.05D. Using vector analysis to take into account cylinder power and axis, mean bearing fixing astigmatism was not significantly different from cross-cylinder astigmatism, but did have higher test-retest variability (p<0.05). Acuity with bearing fixing and cross-cylinder corrections did not significantly differ in average value or repeatability. Bearing fixing is a feasible method for subjective determination of astigmatism, and there are a number of potential improvements to the method which could make it faster and more precise.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
