Abstract

Beamwidth measures how a sonar system distributes emitted energy or receiver sensitivity over angle. For man-made sonars, this is considered to be of critical importance, since a small beamwidth supports high-resolution imaging. For bat biosonar, the role of beamwidth is far less clear. In order to investigate how biosonar beamwidths could compare to its man-made peers, we have compiled beamwidth data for bats (based on numerical predictions) and man-made sonar systems (based on data sheets). An analysis of this data shows that bat biosonar and man-made sonars operate in very different regimes with respect to the ratio of characteristic dimension (i.e., aperture diameter for bats and array length for man-made sonars) to wavelength. Whereas the aperture diameters of bats ranged from falling below the employed wavelength to being about 10 times larger, man-made sonars were typically at least one order of magnitude larger than the employed wavelengths and ranged up to 1000 times larger. Furthermore, for any given characteristic-dimension-to-wavelength ratio, bats showed much more variability in beamwidth than man-made sonar. In fact, the variability in the bat beamwidths was found to be as large as that in a set of random horns, which indicates a role for other determining factors.Beamwidth measures how a sonar system distributes emitted energy or receiver sensitivity over angle. For man-made sonars, this is considered to be of critical importance, since a small beamwidth supports high-resolution imaging. For bat biosonar, the role of beamwidth is far less clear. In order to investigate how biosonar beamwidths could compare to its man-made peers, we have compiled beamwidth data for bats (based on numerical predictions) and man-made sonar systems (based on data sheets). An analysis of this data shows that bat biosonar and man-made sonars operate in very different regimes with respect to the ratio of characteristic dimension (i.e., aperture diameter for bats and array length for man-made sonars) to wavelength. Whereas the aperture diameters of bats ranged from falling below the employed wavelength to being about 10 times larger, man-made sonars were typically at least one order of magnitude larger than the employed wavelengths and ranged up to 1000 times larger. Furthermore, for any ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call