Abstract
The shocking discovery that the majority (75%–89%) of preclinical research studies, predominantly oncology related and published in top-tier journals, could not be reproduced was recently reported for 2 independent retrospective observational studies (1, 2). The findings of nonreproducibility in these studies were interestingly consistent. What can help determine whether research results will stand the test of time? In a recent article in Nature , Begley noted that whether you are an author, …
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
