BDS-3/BDS-2 FCB estimation considering different influencing factors and precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution

Abstract

Since the full system deployment of BDS-3 in July 2020, it has provided stable and reliable positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) services for users around the world. It is an urgent task to explore the potential performance of precise point positioning (PPP) based on the full constellation of BDS-2/BDS-3. This research presented the global satellite visibility of BDS-2/BDS-3, analyzed the stability and accuracy of BDS-2 and BDS-3 rubidium clocks and hydrogen clocks, jointly estimated the BDS-2 and BDS-3 fractional cycle biases (FCB) and evaluated the PPP performance with ambiguity resolution (AR). Due to the fact that International GNSS Service (IGS) precise products have a great impact on narrow-lane (NL) FCB estimation, the FCB obtained by using the precise products from CODE (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) and GBM (Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum) in two different analysis centers and the FCB obtained by using GBM precise products with different calculation strategies are analyzed. In addition, the experimental data from Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX), EUREF (EPN) and Germany (GPN) observation networks are used to evaluate the influence of orbital errors on BDS FCB estimation. For wide-lane (WL) FCB, MGEX WL FCB has the highest accuracy, followed by EPN and GPN. On the contrary, for NL FCB, MGEX NL FCB has the worst accuracy, followed by EPN, and GPN is the best. Eventually, numerous experiment results showed that compared with the static float solution, the PPP fixed solutions in East (E), North (N) and Up (U) directions are improved by 32.9%, 27.7%, 13.8% for BDS-3 and 10.0%, 7.5%, 3.8% for BDS-2/BDS-3. Compared with the kinematic float solution, the PPP fixed solutions in E, N and U directions are improved by 27.9%, 23.4%, 16.6% for BDS-3 and 15.9%, 8.9%, 5.3% for BDS-2/BDS-3.