Abstract
This paper examines the legal nature of the Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and highlights the problem which may occur during the application of the Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind to the marine genetic resources in the area beyond national jurisdiction, based on logical interpretation. First of all, Chapter 2 examines the meaning of the Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind and the detailed elements that make up this Principle in the UNCLOS, and points out the grounds for asserting the peremptory nature of the Principles of Common Heritage of Mankind and its limitations. Chapter 3 confirms the background of the BBNJ discussion, which is underway to fill the gap of biodiversity discipline in the area beyond national jurisdiction, and shows that the application of the Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind is being proposed there. Chapter 4 compares and analyzes the articles which is related with the Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind between the revised draft of the BBNJ and UNCLOS, emphasizes that the principle in the BBNJ are logically inconsistent with the that appeared in UNCLOS. In conclusion, suggests that further research about peremptory nature and analogy of the Principles of Common Heritage of Mankind is needed to clarify the discipline principle to be applied to the BBNJ, and that the discipline principle of the BBNJ should be presented again accordingly.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.