Abstract

A. Pajor and J. Osiewalski Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Cracow University of Economics Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Krakow, Poland Bayesian assessments of value-at-risk and expected shortfall for a given portfolio of dimension n can be based either on the n-variate predictive distribution of future returns of individual assets, or on the univariate model for portfolio volatility. In both cases, the Bayesian VaR and ES fully take into account parameter uncertainty and non-linear relationship between ordinary and logarithmic returns. We use the n-variate type I MSF-SBEKK(1,1) volatility model proposed specially to cope with large n. We compare empirical results obtained using this (more demanding) multivariate approach and the much simpler univariate approach based on modelling volatility of the whole portfolio (of a given structure).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.