Abstract

Jointed structures in engineering naturally perform with some of nonlinearity and uncertainty, which significantly affect the dynamic characteristics of the structural system. In this paper, the method of Bayesian uncertainty identification of model parameters for the jointed structures with local nonlinearity is proposed. Firstly, the nonlinear stiffness and damping of the joints under the random excitation are represented with functions of excitation magnitude in terms of the equivalent linearization. The process of uncertainty identification is separated from the representation of local nonlinearity. In this way, the dynamic behavior of the joints is penetratingly characterized instead of ascribing the nonlinearity to uncertainty. Secondly, a variable-expanded Bayesian (VEB) method is originally proposed to identify the mixed of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties of model parameters. Different from traditional Bayesian identification, the aleatory uncertainties of model parameters are identified as one of the most important parts rather than only measurement noise of output. Notablely, a series of intermediate variables are introduced to expand the parameter with aleatory uncertainty in order to overcome the difficulty of establishing the likelihood function. Moreover, a 3-DOF numerical example is illustrated with case studies to verify the proposed method. The influence of observed sample size and prior distribution selection on the identification results is tested. Furthermore, an engineering example of the jointed structure with rubber isolators is performed to show the practicability of the proposed method. It is indicated that the computational model updated with the accurately identified parameters with both nonlinearity and uncertainty has shown the excellent predictive capability.

Highlights

  • Engineering structures with joints usually behave with some of the nonlinear vibration characteristics. ese nonlinear phenomena are usually concentrated in the local joints of the parts, such as bolt flanges, interference/clearance fit, cushion, and vibration isolator

  • It may lead to complex nonlinear responses such as natural frequency shift, phase distortion, frequency response jump, and other phenomena [1,2,3] with the increase of excitation levels. ough calculation of the direct nonlinear responses has been studied for many years, it is still in difficulty for dealing with engineering structures with a huge number of degrees of freedom (DOFs), especially under random excitations. e equivalent linearization to deal with nonlinearity is currently adopted because of the maturity and convenience to calculate the random vibration response [4, 5]

  • In order to address both the nonlinearity and uncertainties of jointed structures under random excitation, equivalent linearization and Bayesian identification method are used in this paper

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Engineering structures with joints usually behave with some of the nonlinear vibration characteristics. ese nonlinear phenomena are usually concentrated in the local joints of the parts, such as bolt flanges, interference/clearance fit, cushion, and vibration isolator. Combined with the equivalent linearization under different magnitudes of random excitations, the local nonlinearity is characterized together with the uncertainties for jointed structures. E frequency response function (FRF) of the nonlinear system under the random excitation is defined by (3) It appears to be linear in terms of its shape with eigenfrequency drifting as shown in Figure 2(a): Hnr(ω). Taking modal parameters (i.e., natural frequency and damping ratio) from the FRFs with different vibration magnitudes as the target, the equivalent stiffness and damping of the nonlinear elements could be obtained, respectively, as shown in the following: keq(A) 􏽨keq1(A), keq2(A), . According to the FRF of a nonlinear system with a signal DOF under different magnitudes of random excitation as shown, the equivalent stiffness and damping of the nonlinear spring-damping element are shown, respectively.

Bayesian Identification of the Model Parameter Uncertainties
Numerical Examples
Case Study 1
Case Study 2
Posterior
Conclusions
Findings
Conflicts of Interest
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call