Abstract

Logistic regression (LR) and naïve Bayes (NB) extensively used for prediction of fault-proneness assume linear addition and independence that often cannot hold in practice. Hence, we propose a Bayesian network (BN) model with incorporation of data mining techniques as an integrative approach. Compared with LR and NB, BN provides a flexible modeling framework, thus avoiding the corresponding assumptions. Using the static metrics such as Chidamber and Kemerer’s (C-K) suite and complexity as predictors, the differences in performance between LR, NB and BN models were examined for fault-proneness prediction at the class level in continual releases (five versions) of Rhino, an open-source implementation of JavaScript, developed using the agile process. By cross validation and independent test of continual versions, we conclude that the proposed BN can achieve a better prediction than LR and NB for the agile software due to its flexible modeling framework and incorporation of multiple sophisticated learning algorithms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.