Abstract
We study a multi-player model of sequential communication. A receiver obtains information from two sources. The first is cheap talk with a sender, who acquires the information, while the second is Bayesian persuasion with a mediator, who modifies the initial information. We prove that Bayesian persuasion does not defy truthful communication in cheap talk, but reduces the ex-ante utility of the sender. However, the fineness of the state-space partition in cheap talk can be altered to mitigate utility losses. We also demonstrate that a signalling rule in the persuasion is defined by whether the revealed partition element triggers an action of the receiver that is unfavourable to the mediator. In addition, we characterise preferences of the mediator regarding a cheap-talk partition formed by the sender. Finally, we illustrate our results drawing on a communication process between tax authorities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.