Abstract

Bayesian optimization (BO) is an indispensable tool to optimize objective functions that either do not have known functional forms or are expensive to evaluate. Currently, optimal experimental design is always conducted within the workflow of BO leading to more efficient exploration of the design space compared to traditional strategies. This can have a significant impact on modern scientific discovery, in particular autonomous materials discovery, which can be viewed as an optimization problem aimed at looking for the maximum (or minimum) point for the desired materials properties. The performance of BO-based experimental design depends not only on the adopted acquisition function but also on the surrogate models that help to approximate underlying objective functions. In this paper, we propose a fully autonomous experimental design framework that uses more adaptive and flexible Bayesian surrogate models in a BO procedure, namely Bayesian multivariate adaptive regression splines and Bayesian additive regression trees. They can overcome the weaknesses of widely used Gaussian process-based methods when faced with relatively high-dimensional design space or non-smooth patterns of objective functions. Both simulation studies and real-world materials science case studies demonstrate their enhanced search efficiency and robustness.

Highlights

  • The concept of optimal experimental design, within the overall framework of Bayesian optimization (BO), has been put forward as a design strategy to circumvent the limitations of traditional exploration of design spaces

  • PBO36,51 successfully avoids the optimization of acquisition functions by intelligently partitioning the space based on observed experiments and exploring promising areas, greatly reducing computations

  • We focused on acquisitionbased BO (ABO) to construct the autonomous workflow for material discovery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of optimal experimental design, within the overall framework of Bayesian optimization (BO), has been put forward as a design strategy to circumvent the limitations of traditional (costly) exploration of (arbitrary) design spaces. The use of a Bayesian surrogate model does not impose any a priori restrictions (such as concavity or convexity) on the objective function It was mainly introduced by Mockus[1] and Kushner[2] and pioneered by Jones et al.[3], who developed a framework that balanced the need to exploit available knowledge of the design space with the objective to explore it by using a metric or policy that selects the best experiment to carry out with the endgoal of accelerating the iterative design process. Multiple extensions have been developed to make the algorithm more efficient[4,5,6,7] This popular tool has been successfully used in a wide range of applications[8,9]. Extensive surveys of this method and its applications can be found[10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call