Abstract

AbstractWe focus upon flexible Bayesian hierarchical models for scientific data available at geo‐coded locations. Investigators are increasingly turning to spatial process models to analyze such datasets. These models are customarily estimated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which have become especially popular for spatial modeling, given their flexibility and power to fit models that would be infeasible otherwise. However, estimating Bayesian spatial process models is undermined by prohibitive computational expenses associated with parameter estimation. Classes of low‐rank spatial process models are increasingly being deployed to resolve this problem by projecting spatial effects to a lower‐dimensional subspace. We discuss how a low‐rank process called the ‘predictive process’ seamlessly enters the hierarchical modeling framework and helps us accrue substantial computational benefits.WIREs Comp Stat2012, 4:59–66. doi: 10.1002/wics.187This article is categorized under:Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Bayesian Methods and TheoryData: Types and Structure > Image and Spatial DataStatistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)Data: Types and Structure > Image and Spatial Data

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call