Abstract

First settlement of Polynesia, and population expansion throughout the ancestral Polynesian homeland are foundation events for global history. A precise chronology is paramount to informed archaeological interpretation of these events and their consequences. Recently applied chronometric hygiene protocols excluding radiocarbon dates on wood charcoal without species identification all but eliminates this chronology as it has been built for the Kingdom of Tonga, the initial islands to be settled in Polynesia. In this paper we re-examine and redevelop this chronology through application of Bayesian models to the questioned suite of radiocarbon dates, but also incorporating short-lived wood charcoal dates from archived samples and high precision U/Th dates on coral artifacts. These models provide generation level precision allowing us to track population migration from first Lapita occupation on the island of Tongatapu through Tonga’s central and northern island groups. They further illustrate an exceptionally short duration for the initial colonizing Lapita phase and a somewhat abrupt transition to ancestral Polynesian society as it is currently defined.

Highlights

  • Willard Libby’s 1949 development of radiocarbon dating is arguably the single greatest scientific advancement in the history of archaeology

  • Oceanic archaeology is in the midst of chronological reassessment, where chronometric hygiene protocols for sample identifications and use of short-lived samples is pre-eminent

  • As Tonga is the first island group settled in Polynesia, this becomes problematic for answering “when questions” associated with Polynesian origins and ancestral Polynesian society

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Willard Libby’s 1949 development of radiocarbon dating is arguably the single greatest scientific advancement in the history of archaeology. It allows us to re-analyze the Tongan radiocarbon data set for Lapita and Polynesian Plainware phases within the three island groups of Tongatapu, Ha‘apai and Vavau. Gain insight into the extent of this lag, and to develop a precise chronology for Lapita expansion and its duration in each island group, we applied an Oxcal Bayesian overlap model for 46 Lapita-associated dates.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call