Abstract
The previous work of Xiang et al. [Xiang & Goggans, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (2001), pp. 1415‐1424; 113 (2003), pp. 2685‐2697; Xiang & Jasa, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) pp.3744‐3749] successfully applied the Bayesian formulism to estimate multiple decay parameters from Schroeder decay functions measured or calculated in acoustically coupled spaces. In this work we consider a more difficult problem of determining the correct decay model in the presence of energy decay data within the Bayesian framework. We will compare the Annealing/Thermodynamic algorithm [Neal, R. M., Statistics and Computing 11 (2001), pp. 125‐139], the Nested Sampling algorithm [Silvia & Skilling, Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial, Oxford Science Publications (2006)], and a combined Variational/Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach in order to determine the correct decay model. The advantages/shortcomings of these methods are discussed in the context of the decay model selection and parameter estimation using experimentally measured data from real coupled spaces.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.