Abstract

Accurate groundwater level (GWL) prediction is essential for the sustainable management of groundwater resources. However, the prediction of GWLs remains a challenge due to insufficient data and the complicated hydrogeological system. In this study, we investigated the ability of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data, the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) data, the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) data, and the publicly available meteorological data in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-ahead GWL prediction using three traditional machine learning models (extreme learning machine, ELM; support vector machine, SVR; and random forest, RF). Meanwhile, we further developed the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) by combining the ELM, SVR, and RF models to avoid the uncertainty of the single models and to improve the predicting accuracy. The validity of the forcing data and the BMA model were assessed for three GWL monitoring wells in the Zhangye Basin in Northwest China. The results indicated that the applied forcing data could be treated as validated inputs to predict the GWL up to 3 months ahead due to the achieved high accuracy of the machine learning models (NS > 0.55). The BMA model could significantly improve the performance of the single machine learning models. Overall, the BMA model reduced the RMSE of the ELM, SVR, and RF models in the testing period by about 13.75%, 24.01%, and 17.69%, respectively; while it improved the NS by about 8.32%, 16.13%, and 9.67% for 1-, 2-, and 3-month-ahead GWL prediction, respectively. The uncertainty analysis results also verified the reliability of the BMA model in multi-time-ahead GWL predicting. This highlighted the efficiency of the satellite data, satellite-based data, and publicly available data as substitute inputs in machine-learning-based GWL prediction, particularly for areas with insufficient or missing data. Meanwhile, the BMA ensemble strategy can serve as a powerful and reliable approach in multi-time-ahead GWL prediction when risk-based decision making is needed or a lack of relevant hydrogeological data impedes the application of the physical models.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.