Abstract

Bayesian and Maximum Entropy approaches allow for a statistically sound and systematic fitting of experimental and computational data. Unfortunately, assessing the relative confidence in these two types of data remains difficult as several steps add unknown error. Here we propose the use of a validation-set method to determine the balance, and thus the amount of fitting. We apply the method to synthetic NMR chemical shift data of an intrinsically disordered protein. We show that the method gives consistent results even when other methods to assess the amount of fitting cannot be applied. Finally, we also describe how the errors in the chemical shift predictor can lead to an incorrect fitting and how using secondary chemical shifts could alleviate this problem.

Highlights

  • Disordered Proteins (IDPs) do not fold into stable conformations, because their free energy landscapes possess many shallow local minima

  • In this work we have shown how chemical shifts can be used to improve the configurations arising from molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins

  • We have introduced a systematic method to assess the amount of reweighting (θ) needed to fit the experimental chemical shifts based on cross-validation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disordered Proteins (IDPs) do not fold into stable conformations, because their free energy landscapes possess many shallow local minima. Some of these may correspond to conformations rich in secondary structure and α-helices appear to be the most common of these regular structures. Their ability to fold into different conformations allows IDPs to interact with different binding partners and tuning their populations by post-translational modifications can allow for the regulation of important cellular functions. Several methods exist to generate ensembles of configurations representing the conformational heterogeneity of IDPs, including all-atom molecular dynamics simulations [1], implicit-solvent. Because equilibrium sampling of the IDPs conformational space is challenging to achieve, mainly due to its enormous size

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.