Abstract
We discuss three learning rules for generalized Bayesian updating of an imprecise probability: (a modified version of) the generalized Bayes’ rule, the maximum likelihood update rule (after Gilboa and Schmeidler) and a newly developed hybrid rule. We investigate the general methodology for a special class of multivariate probability measures with prescribed marginals but arbitrary correlation structure. Both the choice and analysis of this class are motivated by expert interviews that we conducted with modelers in the field of climatic change. We argue that both updating rules from the literature have strong limitations, the generalized Bayes’ rule is too conservative, i.e., too inclusive, while the maximum likelihood update rule being too exclusive, adding spurious information. As a powerful extension we introduce a new rule for Bayesian updating of an imprecise measure: a “weighted likelihood update method,” which bases Bayesian updating on the whole set of priors but weights the influence of its members. We study the different rules in the case of bivariate Gaussian priors. Our investigation shows that the new rule combines certain attractive features of the generalized Bayes’ rule and the maximum likelihood update rule. In this article we aim at highlighting the sequence of not yet fully resolved statistical issues a practitioner on complex mechanistic models would face when updating imprecise prior knowledge.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.