Abstract
Investigating the similarity and changes in brain networks under different mental conditions has become increasingly important in neuroscience research. A standard separate estimation strategy fails to pool information across networks and hence has reduced estimation accuracy and power to detect between-network differences. Motivated by an fMRI Stroop task experiment that involves multiple related tasks, we develop an integrative Bayesian approach for jointly modeling multiple brain networks that provides a systematic inferential framework for network comparisons. The proposed approach explicitly models shared and differential patterns via flexible Dirichlet process-based priors on edge probabilities. Conditional on edges, the connection strengths are modeled via Bayesian spike-and-slab prior on the precision matrix off-diagonals. Numerical simulations illustrate that the proposed approach has increased power to detect true differential edges while providing adequate control on false positives and achieves greater network estimation accuracy compared to existing methods. The Stroop task data analysis reveals greater connectivity differences between task and fixation that are concentrated in brain regions previously identified as differentially activated in Stroop task, and more nuanced connectivity differences between exertion and relaxed task. In contrast, penalized modeling approaches involving computationally burdensome permutation tests reveal negligible network differences between conditions that seem biologically implausible. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.
Highlights
The Stroop task (Stroop 1935) is one of the most reliable psychometric tests (MacLeod 1991) that is widely used as an index of attention and executive control
In one of the first such efforts to our knowledge, we investigate how the brain network reorganizes under different cognitive conditions corresponding to passive fixation and task performance, as well as between effortful and relaxed task performance, under a Stroop task experiment
Our analysis revealed 1550 significantly different edges that provide evidence supporting the study hypothesis that there are major differences in the brain networks due to the manifest phenomenological and procedural dissimilarity of task performance and rest
Summary
The Stroop task (Stroop 1935) is one of the most reliable psychometric tests (MacLeod 1991) that is widely used as an index of attention and executive control. Neuroimaging studies have shown differential activation in several brain regions related to the Stroop task (Gruber et al 2002; Shan et al 2018). Existing connectivity studies have focused on independent component analysis or ICA (Wang et al 2018), seed region based correlation analysis (Levinson et al 2018), and pairwise correlation analysis (Peterson et al 1999). None of existing methods investigated connectivity differences related to varying mental effort in Stroop task, recent evidence point to significant brain activation differences when the task is performed by voluntarily engaging a maximum or a minimum of mental effort (Khachouf et al 2017)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.