Abstract

Gaussian graphical models are a popular tool to learn the dependence structure in the form of a graph among variables of interest. Bayesian methods have gained in popularity in the last two decades due to their ability to simultaneously learn the covariance and the graph. There is a wide variety of model-based methods to learn the underlying graph assuming various forms of the graphical structure. Although for scalability of the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms, decomposability is commonly imposed on the graph space, its possible implication on the posterior distribution of the graph is not clear. An open problem in Bayesian decomposable structure learning is whether the posterior distribution is able to select a meaningful decomposable graph that is "close" to the true non-decomposable graph, when the dimension of the variables increases with the sample size. In this article, we explore specific conditions on the true precision matrix and the graph, which results in an affirmative answer to this question with a commonly used hyper-inverse Wishart prior on the covariance matrix and a suitable complexity prior on the graph space. In absence of structural sparsity assumptions, our strong selection consistency holds in a high-dimensional setting where p = O(nα ) for α < 1/3. We show when the true graph is non-decomposable, the posterior distribution concentrates on a set of graphs that are minimal triangulations of the true graph.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.